有关网络审查- gary king的研究论文

 

http://gking.harvard.edu/files/gking/files/censored.pdf

这里可以看到全文。

Contrary to previous understandings, posts with negative, even vitriolic, criticism of the state, its leaders, and its policies are not more likely to be censored.
Instead, we show that the censorship program is aimed at curtailing collective action by silencing comments that represent, reinforce, or spur social mobilization, regardless of content.
Censorship is oriented toward attempting  to forestall collective activities that are occurring now or may occur in the future- and , as such , seem to clearly expose the government intent.
Gary King的发现很有意思, 那就是网络审查, 强行删除的不是那些反对和激进的言论, 而是针对有关召集组织的信息。
着说是政府的预防措施, 以及应急性更强吗?
论文还没看完。 但是有意思的在于其研究方法, 很好奇通过瞬间扫描的方式, 如何能确保得到足够的删除前的entreis 呢?
其次,那就是研究的scan, 具体时段问题。 很可能是恰好那段时间群体性事件多了,所以审查的力度加大了? 这些都必须要有所控制。
再次, 比如18 再来了加号的做法, 或者用暗喻,调侃的方式的weibo , 是如何处理的呢?
最后, 在有关如何处理大data方面, 参考になりました!

 

Advertisements

Tagged: , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: